Support for the Intercollegiate Negotiation Competition
The Sumitomo Group Public Affairs Committee strives to support university students’
negotiation skills, assist in upgrading higher education, and contribute to global human resources
development through the Intercollegiate Negotiation Competition.
Intercollegiate
Negotiation Competition website
23rd (2024) Intercollegiate Negotiation Competition
On November 16 and 17, 2024, the 23rd Intercollegiate Negotiation Competition (INC) took place at Sophia University in Tokyo.
With 36 teams competing in Japanese and 28 in English, there were 279 contestants in all. 20 Japanese universities participated: Hokkaido University, Tohoku University, the University of Tokyo, Waseda University, Meiji University, Sophia University, Chuo University, Gakushuin University, Nihon University, Rikkyo University, Tsukuba University, Keio University, Hitotsubashi University, Nagoya University, Kyoto University, Doshisha University, Ritsumeikan University, Osaka University, Kyushu University, and Seinan Gakuin University. Nine teams participated from overseas: Team Australia, the National University of Singapore, the National University of Mongolia, SolBridge International School of Business, Peking University School of Transnational Law, George Mason University Korea Campus, Temple University Japan Campus, Government Law College Mumbai, and Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University.
Tournament chart
<Japanese>
|
Round A / arbitration |
Round B / negotiation |
Red |
Blue |
Red |
Blue |
1 |
Rikkyo J1 |
Tohoku J1 |
Singapore J1 |
Ritsumeikan J1 |
2 |
Waseda J1 |
Meiji J2 |
Sophia J3 |
Kyusyu J1 |
3 |
Gakushuin J1 |
Hitotsubashi J1 |
Waseda J1 |
Kyoto J1 |
4 |
Tokyo J2 |
Osaka J1 |
Doshisha J2 |
Hitotsubashi J2 |
5 |
Sophia J1 |
Meiji J1 |
Sophia J2 |
Osaka J2 |
6 |
Gakushuin J2 |
Kyusyu J1 |
Rikkyo J1 |
Osaka J1 |
7 |
Nihon J1 |
Kyoto J1 |
Tokyo J2 |
Meiji J3 |
8 |
Tokyo J1 |
Kyusyu J2 |
Gakushuin J2 |
Chuo J1 |
9 |
Singapore J1 |
Hitotsubashi J2 |
Waseda J2 |
Kyusyu J2 |
10 |
Sophia J3 |
Kyoto J2 |
Doshisha J1 |
Meiji J1 |
11 |
Rikkyo J3 |
Hitotsubashi J3 |
Tokyo J1 |
Hitotsubashi J3 |
12 |
Doshisha J2 |
Osaka J2 |
Nihon J1 |
Tohoku J1 |
13 |
Sophia J2 |
Chuo J2 |
Rikkyo J2 |
Kyoto J2 |
14 |
SeinanGakuin J1 |
Meiji J3 |
SeinanGakuin J1 |
Chuo J2 |
15 |
Rikkyo J2 |
Ritsumeikan J1 |
Hokkaido J1 |
Tsukuba J1 |
16 |
Hokkaido J1 |
Mongolia J1 |
Rikkyo J3 |
Meiji J2 |
17 |
Doshisha J1 |
Tsukuba J1 |
Sophia J1 |
Hitotsubashi J1 |
18 |
Waseda J2 |
Chuo J1 |
Gakushuin J1 |
Mongolia J1 |
<English>
|
Round A / arbitration |
Round B / negotiation |
Red |
Blue |
Red |
Blue |
1 |
Singapore E1 |
Chuo E1 |
Solbridge E1 |
Chuo E1 |
2 |
GLCMumbai E1 |
Nagoya E1 |
GLCMumbai E1 |
Chuo E2 |
3 |
Rikkyo E2 |
George Mason University, Korea Campus E1 |
Singapore E2 |
Meiji E1 |
4 |
Peking E1 |
Nagoya E2 |
Temple E2 |
Hitotsubashi E1 |
5 |
Temple E2 |
Mongolia E1 |
Rikkyo E2 |
Keio E1 |
6 |
Waseda E1 |
Hitotsubashi E1 |
Singapore E1 |
Nagoya E1 |
7 |
Tokyo E2 |
Team Australia E1 |
Tokyo E1 |
Nagoya E2 |
8 |
GLCMumbai E2 |
Meiji E1 |
GLCMumbai E2 |
Ritsumeikan E1 |
9 |
Singapore E2 |
Keio E1 |
Rikkyo E1 |
Kyusyu E1 |
10 |
Sophia E1 |
Team Australia E2 |
Peking E1 |
Team Australia E1 |
11 |
Rikkyo E1 |
Chuo E2 |
Waseda E1 |
Team Australia E2 |
12 |
Temple E1 |
Ritsumeikan E1 |
Sophia E1 |
Mongolia E1 |
13 |
Solbridge E1 |
Kyusyu E1 |
Temple E1 |
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha E1 |
14 |
Tokyo E1 |
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha E1 |
Tokyo E2 |
George Mason University, Korea Campus E1 |
Problems and the Competition Outline
The competition has two parts, Round A devoted to arbitration and Round B to negotiation, with Japanese and English divisions for each part. In both rounds, the theme was breach of obligations under a contract between Red Museum, which is a national institution with a long history, and Blue, Inc., a company involved in urban development, large-scale facility construction, real estate leasing, and the operation of commercial and resort facilities. The arbitration and negotiation concerned construction of a new museum wing and the loan of artworks for an exhibition. The teams took on the roles of either Red or Blue.
The issues to be arbitrated in Round A were 1) the New Wing Case and 2) the Orange Collection Case.
The New Wing Case was about a serious incident in an exhibition room of the New Wing of the Red Museum, which occurred after the handover and opening of the new wing. The construction of the new wing was contracted to Blue. There are four issues to be considered.
1) Did Blue breach its obligations?:
Room temperatures in a gallery of the
new wing rose sharply and humidity
levels greatly exceeded the design
standards.
According to the evaluation
report by the external
experts engaged by
Red, discrepancies between the
design
documents and the actual
placement of
sensors and piping may have been the
cause.
2) If Blue breached its obligation, how much
compensation should Blue pay?:
Ten paintings were damaged.
3) Is Red obligated to pay USD 200,000 to
Blue?:
Blue has spent USD 200,000 to repair the
new wing. Blue claims that it should be
borne by Red.
4) Should the arbitration proceedings be
suspended?
Should the decision by the
technical expert agreed upon
by both
parties be used as the basis for the
arbitration process?
On the other hand, regarding the Orange Collection Case, Red asked Blue to acquire the “Orange Collection,” having concluded an agreement granting Blue an exclusive agency right representing Red. However, Red acquired certain pieces through Green and the rest of the pieces directly. There were two issues.
1) Did Red breach its obligations?:
It needs to be determined whether the
exception clause to the exclusive agency
applies.
2) If Red breached its obligations, how much
compensation should Red pay?:
The teams acted as attorneys representing either Red or Blue, stating their claims in
the presence of the arbitrators whose roles were played by the judges.
In Round B, the teams negotiated the following two points, assuming that the New Wing Case exists but has not undergone arbitration, and that the Orange Collection Case does not exist.
1) How to resolve the New Wing Case
through
negotiation
2) The terms for the loan of the 12 artworks
owned by Blue to Red
Judges and Officials
Over the two days, a total of 143 people, including legal professionals, academics, and corporate legal staff, extended cooperation to INC by serving as judges. Some matches were held in a hybrid format with certain judges participating online. INC alumni supported INC as officials in charge of reception, other arrangements, and the matches.
Results of the 23rd INC
The awards ceremony always has an element of high drama. On the one hand, there is the delight of the winning team, and on the other hand, the disappointment of the runners-up. The drama attests to the contestants’ commitment and enthusiasm. Team Australia received the first prize as well as the Best Teamwork Award. The teams with the highest scores in the competition in Japanese were Osaka University for arbitration and Sophia University for negotiation. In the competition in English, Team Australia had the highest scores for both arbitration and negotiation.
Results
1st prize |
Team Australia |
227.25 points |
2nd prize |
Sophia University |
210 points |
3rd prize |
National University of Singapore |
209.8333 points |
4th prize |
The University of Tokyo |
208.5 points |
5th prize |
Osaka University |
204 points |
6th prize |
Nihon University |
201 points |
6th prize |
George Mason University, Korea Campus |
201 points |
8th prize |
Meiji University |
200 points |
9th prize |
Kyushu University |
199.8333 points |
10th prize |
Chuo University |
199 points |
Awards by Category
Best Teamwork Award |
Team Australia |
Highest score for the competition in Japanese for arbitration |
Osaka University |
Highest score for the competition in Japanese for negotiation |
Sophia University |
Highest score for the competition in English for arbitration |
Team Australia |
Highest score for the competition in English for negotiation |
Team Australia |
Results for the competition in Japanese
1st prize |
The University of Tokyo |
2nd prize |
Sophia University |
3rd prize |
Osaka University |
4th prize |
Nihon University |
5th prize |
Seinan Gakuin University |
Results for the competition in English
1st prize |
Team Australia |
2nd prize |
National University of Singapore |
3rd prize |
Sophia University |
4th prize |
Meiji University |
5th prize |
The University of Tokyo |
Click here to read about previous Intercollegiate Negotiation
Competitions.