![](/english/act/img/spacer.gif) |
Sumitomo Group Public Affairs Committee would like to contribute to global human resource development through the Intercollegiate Negotiation Competition supporting the negotiation skill upgrading education.
The 5th Intercollegiate Negotiation Competition was held in Sophia University on December 2nd-3rd, 2006. In addition to 13 schools of University of Tokyo, Kyoto University, Nagoya University, Osaka University, Kyushu University, Chuo University, Doshisha University, Sophia University, Waseda University, Keio University, Hitotsubashi University, Hokkaido University and Tohoku University which had participated in the previous competition, Gakushuin University participated for the first time and also, Australian National University participated again to form Team Australia jointly with University of Sydney which participated for the first time. Totally, 209 undergraduate and graduate students from 16 universities performed enthusiastically.
|
![](/english/act/img/spacer.gif) |
![](/english/committee/event/college/05/img/inc5_01.jpg)
Opening ceremony
![](/english/committee/event/college/05/img/inc5_02.jpg)
Mitsuru Iba, Secretary General, Sumitomo Group Public Affairs Committee
General Manager, Corporate Communications Dept., Sumitomo Corporation
|
![](/english/committee/event/college/05/img/inc5_03.jpg)
Performance in Japanese
|
![](/english/act/img/spacer.gif) |
![](/english/committee/event/college/05/img/inc5_04.jpg)
Performance in English
|
Pairing
<Japanese>
|
Round A/arbitration
|
Round B/negotiation
|
Red
|
Blue
|
Red
|
Blue
|
1
|
Tokyo1
|
Hokkaido1
|
Doshisha2
|
Chuo1
|
2
|
Keio1
|
Hokkaido2
|
Kyushu2
|
Sophia1
|
3
|
Doshisha1
|
Hitotsubashi1
|
Tokyo1
|
Hitotsubashi1
|
4
|
Tohoku
|
Chuo1
|
Kyushu1
|
Hokkaido1
|
5
|
Kyushu1
|
Waseda2
|
Keio1
|
Waseda1
|
6
|
Doshisha2
|
Australia
|
Tohoku
|
Waseda2
|
7
|
Gakushuin2
|
Kyoto
|
Tokyo2
|
Kyoto
|
8
|
Tokyo2
|
Sophia2
|
Gakushuin1
|
Sophia2
|
9
|
Gakushuin1
|
Waseda1
|
Doshisha1
|
Hokkaido2
|
10
|
Kyushu2
|
Chuo2
|
Keio2
|
Hitotsubashi2
|
11
|
Osaka
|
Hitotsubashi2
|
Gakushuin2
|
Chuo2
|
12
|
Keio2
|
Sophia1
|
Osaka
|
Australia
|
|
<English>
|
Round A/arbitration
|
Round B/negotiation
|
Red
|
Blue
|
Red
|
Blue
|
1
|
Kyushu2
|
Nagoya1
|
Doshisha2
|
Waseda2
|
2
|
Doshisha1
|
Waseda1
|
Tokyo
|
Australia
|
3
|
Kyushu1
|
Australia
|
Osaka
|
Nagoya1
|
4
|
Osaka
|
Sophia2
|
Gakushuin
|
Waseda1
|
5
|
Tokyo
|
Nagoya2
|
Keio
|
Hitotsubashi
|
6
|
Doshisha2
|
Hitotsubashi
|
Doshisha1
|
Sophia1
|
7
|
Gakushuin
|
Sophia1
|
Kyushu2
|
Sophia2
|
8
|
Keio
|
Waseda2
|
Kyushu1
|
Nagoya2
|
|
Problem setting and competition outline
This competition consists of arbitration (Round A) and negotiation (Round B), each of them is divided into Japanese and English part. Each team performed enthusiastically to play a role of company.
In the arbitration part, they started with the theme of trouble regarding 2 incidents. The first incident is as follows. Blue Corporation (electronic manufacturer) ordered mobile phone parts to Red Corporation (electronic parts manufacturer) by telephone and FAX. However, there were differences in the model number of parts. Matters concerning completion of a contract became the point of issue. The second incident is when Blue Corporation worker, who is on loan to Red Corporation for a development of new model, made a report to Blue Corporation by his personal computer, data was leaked. An executive responsibility of loaned worker and a content of confidentiality became the point of issue.
Also, in the negotiation part, it’s discussed about what mobile phone business should be between Red Corporation and Blue Corporation. This time, a style of negotiation was different from previous time, that is, each company confirmed the strategy of negotiation and scope of authority with their president (judge) in advance and started negotiations. Then, they reported the result to their president.
![](/english/committee/event/college/05/img/inc5_05.jpg)
Party at the canteen of Sophia University
|
![](/english/act/img/spacer.gif) |
![](/english/committee/event/college/05/img/inc5_06.jpg)
Guest speech by Sinnichi Kitaoka, Professor of University of Tokyo,
former Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary to the United Nations
|
Judges
We had 3 judges for 1 match and young judges of mainly experiencer of this competition participated in the judgment as well as last time. One of the competition’s features is 69 excellent judges consisting of corporation (including dispatches from Sumitomo Group Public Affairs Committee), justice, lawyer and university teacher.
Result of competition
The result of the competition in 2006 is as follows. The 1st prize : Team Australia The 2nd prize : Kyoto University
The 3rd prize : Doshisha University The 4th prize : Sophia University The 5th prize : Nagoya University
|
![](/english/act/img/spacer.gif) |
![](/english/committee/event/college/05/img/inc5_07.jpg)
Presentation of championship cup
|
![](/english/act/img/spacer.gif) |
![](/english/committee/event/college/05/img/inc5_08.jpg)
Winning team : Team Australia
|
|